Mindfulness Should be a Core Skill in Youth Development: More on The Clarissa Effect
Don Siegel
Last Spring Project Coach had a
guest presenter who conducted several sessions on an attentional focusing
technique called Mindfulness. As
taught, participants were instructed to breathe rhythmically and to focus their
attention on various sensations and thoughts that passed through their minds while
they sat quietly in a circle. The overall point of the exercise was to try and
teach PCers that it is important to be able to focus their attention on what is
occurring in the present if they and their players are to perform optimally, as
dwelling on the past or worrying about the future has little bearing on what
one is doing in the moment. Great athletes have learned to be mindful while
performing, leaving thoughts about the past and future to their training
sessions. As we have been told by our coaches, “don’t worry about what just occurred, be in the moment.” But, as so
many of us know, these directions are a lot easier conveyed by coaches than
followed by players. Like other self-regulatory skills, such as managing
stress, learning to stay in the present takes practice. The breathing strategy
deployed by our guest presenter was a good starting point. Nonetheless, we
found that staying in the moment was not so simple, as we needed to learn how to
allow any disruptive thoughts to passively, and non-judgmentally, pass through
our minds while we refocused on the actual sights, sounds, and sensations impinging
on us.
While athletes and coaches know
the value of being in the present, another take on the value of mindfulness relates to what I labeled The Clarissa Effect in my last post.
This entails the phenomenon of program participants starting to thrive only after
years of little change. In Clarissa’s case,
she behaved poorly for a number of years, but all of a sudden started to bloom,
once she realized how much her peers and program staff cared about what she
needed and wanted, and how her own attitudes and behavior had been
counterproductive to her development. The question for all of us who have seen
this story play out time and again is what changed in Clarissa? Why did it take so long for her to follow a more positive
trajectory? Could it be that her self-perceptions and view of the world was
biased by ingrained images of an unhappy past, and a lack of hope for the
future? Was Clarissa’s transformation prolonged because of her inability to
better understand her present situation, in which she was engaged in an array
of enriching experiences and supported by peers and program staff who cared
about her?
As conveyed in my previous post I alluded to Daniel Kahneman’s
ideas about the disconnect between our experiencing self (Self 1), and our
conscious self (Self 2). The gist of his contention is that Self 2, which is
the self with which we have internal conversations, and the one that we think
of as playing a critical role in the choices that we make and the behaviors
that we emit, is greatly influenced by our recall of past experiences. As
Kahneman tells us, Self 2 also bases such judgments on somewhat biased memories
of those experiences, as it has a tendency to recall “peaks and valleys” of
those experiences and how they ultimately ended, more so than the actual ongoing
stream of experience itself. Consequently, a youth may be engaged in activities
that are intrinsically rewarding, highly developmental, and socially redeeming,
but may only label and recall her experience of them by sampling a few salient
events occurring within them that may not authentically reflect their true meaning
and value to her while involved. For example, someone like Clarissa may be participating in a game
of soccer that she seems to thoroughly enjoy, but because of an altercation
that occurs late in the game with a peer, and a subsequent reprimand from a
staff member, may result in her Self 2 labeling the activity unpleasant, and
counterproductive to her personal development, even though a large portion of her
engagement in the activity was extremely positive. Indeed, she may have learned
or enhanced her soccer skills, discovered new ways to foster teamwork with her
fellow players, revealed leadership qualities that she heretofore was not aware
of, and enjoyed the mental and physical challenges of sport. Yet, the
altercation and its aftermath leave Self 2 painting a very different and
negative picture of the overall experience.
I wish to contend that just as mindfulness
training can enhance an athlete’s capacity to perform in the present, it can
also be deployed to help Self 2 better connect with Self 1. Seemingly, if this
is so, then it may be possible to weaken The
Clarissa Effect as Self 2 would get a richer perspective of the many
developmental experiences a youth experiences when participating in a sport
based or other youth development program. The idea here would be for youth to better
understand how what Self 1 experiences is not necessarily what Self 2 recalls,
and that Self 2 needs to do a better job of recalling more of what Self 1 is
experiencing, just as coaches do when they review game film. More succinctly,
if we believe that exposing youth to enriching experiences impacts their
development, then youth need to understand what these experiences are, what
they are learning from them, how participation in them makes them feel, and how
such experiences can impact who they are and how they behave across various
contexts in their lives. On the other hand, if youth are less able to process
all the positive developmental experiences to which they are exposed, then it
seems likely that such exposure will have less of an effect on them, and that The Clarissa Effect will have greater
potency.
While I do not know of any strategies for using Mindfulness Training in this manner, I
would like to propose that we start by adapting a protocol from the Experience
Sampling Methodology (ESM), a technique pioneered by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,
the originator of Flow Theory. Using ESM, subjects are typically
probed at random times while engaging in an activity by answering such
questions as what are you doing, who are you with, how are you feeling, what
are you thinking about, what are you learning, who are you helping, etc? The
basic notion is that by asking youth such questions at random points during
their activities Self 2 will become much more aware of ongoing experience, and,
thus, recall these ongoing experiences much more readily in constructing their
summative memories of them. Project Coach has actually run several ESM studies
and data from them support the notion that youth are able to assess their
ongoing experiences quite accurately. However, we have not yet tested whether
their Self 2 recalls of those experiences correlate highly with what their Self
1’s are saying. Clearly, teaching our youth to be mindful goes well beyond them learning to kick a ball better or
teaching their players to shoot it more accurately. If deployed creatively, my
guess is that it can greatly decrease the time kids like Clarissa get to
“takeoff” velocity.
Posts
